Scores updated for 2026!

Franklin Elementary

Sutter County school performance

Summary

Franklin Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 75th percentile among California school districts.

53.6% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending down.Trending down

51.8% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency53.6%
Current Math Proficiency51.8%
District Reading Rank303 / 977 (69th percentile)
District Math Rank180 / 977 (82nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio25:1
Spend per Student$12,098
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment505
Low-Income Students135 (26.7%)
English Learners39 (7.7%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 4.6 points from last year and fell 9.8 points over the full period. Math fell 5.4 points from last year and fell 8.8 points over the full period.

Reading -9.8 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -8.8 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Joseph Oates

President

N/AN/A

Chris Zunino

Clerk

N/AN/A

Aaron Murphy

Trustee

20222026This year!

Glenn Houston

Trustee

20222026This year!

Kyle O'Neal

Trustee

20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -17.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -7.5 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

9.1% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 56.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -5.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -9.3 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 20.1 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.8 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -8.6 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

18.2% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 55.0% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -1.8 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -7.4 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Franklin Elementary rank in California?

Franklin Elementary ranks No. 303 of 977 in reading and No. 180 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Franklin Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 36.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 37.1%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Franklin Elementary?

Elementary districts in Sutter County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Franklin ElementaryThis district51.8%53.6%
Brittan Elementary29.1%31.5%
Nuestro Elementary24.7%37.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.