Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardFallbrook Union Elementary
San Diego County school performance
Reading and math results average to the 80th percentile among California school districts.
60.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.
50.1% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 60.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 50.1% |
| District Reading Rank | 189 / 977 (81st percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 199 / 977 (80th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $21,151 |
| Schools in District | 9 |
| Student Enrollment | 5,042 |
| Low-Income Students | 3,727 (73.9%) |
| English Learners | 1,225 (24.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 3.8 points from last year and rose 7.9 points over the full period. Math rose 4.9 points from last year and rose 8.3 points over the full period.
•Math +8.3 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Mary McBride Trustee Area No. 5, Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Lief Hansen Trustee Area No. 2, Board Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Ricardo Favela Trustee Area No. 3, Board Clerk [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Frank Golbeck Trustee Area No. 1, Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Maria G. Moran Trustee Area No. 4, Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 25.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
19.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 71.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 27.3 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
16.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 61.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-0.9%Understanding this district
How does Fallbrook Union Elementary rank in California?
Fallbrook Union Elementary ranks No. 189 of 977 in reading and No. 199 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Fallbrook Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 50.6% to 73.0% in reading and 41.5% to 65.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Fallbrook Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 7 of 8 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 7 of 8.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Fallbrook Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 55.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 44.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Fallbrook Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in San Diego County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Fallbrook Union ElementaryThis district | 50.1% | 60.7% |
| Lakeside Union Elementary | 35.3% | 45.6% |
| South Bay Union | 25.2% | 37.6% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
