Scores updated for 2026!

Cinnabar Elementary

Sonoma County school performance

Summary

Cinnabar Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 18th percentile among California school districts.

Only 29.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 18.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency29.9%
Current Math Proficiency18.7%
District Reading Rank808 / 977 (17th percentile)
District Math Rank798 / 977 (18th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio15:1
Spend per Student$24,659
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment176
Low-Income Students14 (66.7%)
English Learners12 (57.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 0.5 points from last year and rose 4.9 points over the full period. Math rose 2.2 points from last year and rose 3.2 points over the full period.

Reading +4.9 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +3.2 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Paul Sequeria

President

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Cathy Thompson

Clerk

[email protected]
N/A2028

Jennifer Elu

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Patty Murch

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Rick O'Hare

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 27.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +24.1 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 41.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -13.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +12.8 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 47.7 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -5.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +43.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 31.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +13.9 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Cinnabar Elementary rank in California?

Cinnabar Elementary ranks No. 808 of 977 in reading and No. 798 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Cinnabar Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 25.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 10.2%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Cinnabar Elementary?

Elementary districts in Sonoma County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Cinnabar ElementaryThis district18.7%29.9%
Dunham Elementary50.6%57.0%
Forestville Union Elementary19.1%41.3%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.