Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardCamino Union Elementary
El Dorado County school performance
Camino Union Elementary is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 63rd percentile among California school districts.
51.9% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 36.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 51.9% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 36.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 335 / 977 (66th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 387 / 977 (61st percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 17:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,897 |
| Schools in District | 2 |
| Student Enrollment | 406 |
| Low-Income Students | 210 (56.0%) |
| English Learners | 50 (13.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading was unchanged from last year and rose 3.1 points over the full period. Math fell 1.2 points from last year and rose 2.6 points over the full period.
•Math +2.6 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Justin Hewitt President | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Pat Kernan Board President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Andrew MacLean Member | 2024 | 2028 |
Deborah Lyster Member | 2024 | 2026This year! |
Nathan Ferris Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 16.2 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
17.1% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 56.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 12.8 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
22.9% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 38.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Camino Union Elementary rank in California?
Camino Union Elementary ranks No. 335 of 977 in reading and No. 387 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Camino Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 2 schools serving K–8, proficiency ranges from 36.4% to 51.9% in reading and 36.4% to 36.7% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Camino Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Camino Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 44.8%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 31.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Camino Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in El Dorado County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Camino Union ElementaryThis district | 36.7% | 51.9% |
| Gold Oak Union Elementary | 23.1% | 37.8% |
| Gold Trail Union Elementary | 42.4% | 55.0% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
