Scores updated for 2026!

Butte Valley Unified

Siskiyou County school performance

Summary

Butte Valley Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 5th percentile among California school districts.

Only 15.8% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 10.1% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency15.8%
Current Math Proficiency10.1%
District Reading Rank936 / 977 (4th percentile)
District Math Rank917 / 977 (6th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$21,030
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment313
Low-Income Students262 (83.7%)
English Learners74 (23.6%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 1.0 points from last year and rose 3.5 points over the full period. Math fell 0.1 points from last year and fell 1.7 points over the full period.

Reading +3.5 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -1.7 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Shannon Struble

President

N/AN/A

Heather Criss

Vice President

N/AN/A

Chet Porterfield

Clerk

N/AN/A

Emanuel Mendoza

Member

N/AN/A

Jeff Heil

Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 26.3 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +1.0 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +12.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 19.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results held steady and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners 0.0 percentage points•
English Native +1.8 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 19.7 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -2.6 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 13.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results held steady and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners 0.0 percentage points•
English Native -6.9 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Butte Valley Unified rank in California?

Butte Valley Unified ranks No. 936 of 977 in reading and No. 917 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Butte Valley Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Butte Valley Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 10.7%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 6.3%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Butte Valley Unified?

Unified districts in Siskiyou County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Butte Valley UnifiedThis district10.1%15.8%
Scott Valley Unified42.8%49.7%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.