Auburn Union Elementary
Placer County school performance
Auburn Union Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 29th percentile among California school districts.
Only 32.4% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.
Math is weaker: 25.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 32.4% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 25.6% |
| District Reading Rank | 763 / 977 (22nd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 629 / 977 (36th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,720 |
| Schools in District | 3 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,373 |
| Low-Income Students | 949 (68.6%) |
| English Learners | 215 (15.5%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 3.5 points from last year and fell 1.5 points over the full period. Math rose 0.1 points from last year and rose 0.9 points over the full period.
•Math +0.9 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Amber Pool Board Member | 2024 | 2028 |
Dowd Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Emily Travis Board Member | 2024 | 2028 |
Holt Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Main Page Content Begins Here Home Our District Board of Trustees Agendas | N/A | N/A |
Mission Statement Board of Trustees | N/A | N/A |
Our District Home Our District Board of Trustees Agendas | N/A | N/A |
Wedge Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 25.4 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
0.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 37.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 28.7 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
2.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 31.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Auburn Union Elementary rank in California?
Auburn Union Elementary ranks No. 763 of 977 in reading and No. 629 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Auburn Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 3 schools serving K–8, proficiency ranges from 20.1% to 48.8% in reading and 15.9% to 41.9% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Auburn Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 0 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 0 of 3.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Auburn Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 23.8%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 15.8%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Auburn Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Placer County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Auburn Union ElementaryThis district | 25.6% | 32.4% |
| Newcastle Elementary | 64.6% | 75.6% |
| Placer Hills Union Elementary | 47.8% | 52.8% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
