Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardAlvord Unified
Riverside County school performance
Alvord Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 36th percentile among California school districts.
Only 38.6% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 25.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 38.6% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 25.6% |
| District Reading Rank | 619 / 977 (37th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 627 / 977 (36th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,810 |
| Schools in District | 23 |
| Student Enrollment | 16,432 |
| Low-Income Students | 14,051 (85.3%) |
| English Learners | 3,876 (23.5%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.5 points from last year and rose 1.8 points over the full period. Math rose 1.4 points from last year and rose 2.3 points over the full period.
•Math +2.3 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Georgina Ramirez Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Carolyn M. Wilson Vice President [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Julie A. Moreno Clerk of the Board [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Amanda A. Vasquez Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Norma O. Berrellez Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 22.3 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
9.6% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 42.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 23.3 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
7.2% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 29.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Alvord Unified rank in California?
Alvord Unified ranks No. 619 of 977 in reading and No. 627 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Alvord Unified’s schools?
Among the 14 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 23.6% to 68.4% in reading and 14.6% to 64.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Alvord Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 15 of 23 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 14 of 23.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Alvord Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 35.5%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 22.3%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Alvord Unified?
Unified districts in Riverside County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Alvord UnifiedThis district | 25.6% | 38.6% |
| Coachella Valley Unified | 19.6% | 32.3% |
| Jurupa Unified | 20.5% | 31.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
