Is this your school? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardLos Angeles Unified District Level Program
CA
Summary
Los Angeles Unified District Level Program is badly underperforming.
Only 8.3% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 3.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 8.3% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 3.7% |
| Reading State Rank | N/A |
| Math State Rank | N/A |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | N/A |
| Student enrollment | N/A |
School Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPP| Admissions | Unknown |
|---|---|
| Charter school | Unknown |
| Magnet school | Unknown |
Test score trends
Reading rose 2.2 points from last year and rose 2.4 points over the full period. Math rose 1.2 points from last year and rose 2.0 points over the full period.
•Math +2.0 percentage points (2024–2026)Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino and White students have the strongest results.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
The share meeting the reading standard ranges from 0.0% to 26.7% across the grades shown.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 0.9 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
5.7% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 7.8% of English-only students. The gap held steady as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino students have the strongest math results at about 5% proficiency. The other reported groups range from about 0% to 3%.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
The share meeting the math standard ranges from 0.0% to 11.4% across the grades shown.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 3.0 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
English-learner math proficiency held steady at 0.0%, while English-only results rose. The gap widened.
