Is this your school? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardLakeport Alternative (Home School)
2508 Howard Avenue, Lakeport, CA 95453-3297
Summary
Lakeport Alternative (Home School) is badly underperforming.
Only 35.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is quickly trending up.
Math is weaker: 13.9% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 35.1% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 13.9% |
| Reading State Rank | N/A |
| Math State Rank | N/A |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 17:1 |
| Student enrollment (2024–25) | 101 |
| Low-Income Students | 77 (76.2%) |
| English Learners | 6 (5.9%) |
| Admissions | Open enrollment |
|---|---|
| Charter school | No |
| Magnet school | No |
Test score trends
Reading rose 13.3 points from last year and rose 24.6 points over the full period. Math rose 7.6 points from last year and rose 9.9 points over the full period.
Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
White and Hispanic or Latino students have the strongest results.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students are 2.7 points ahead in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
White students have the strongest math results at about 27% proficiency. The other reported groups range from about 8% to 8%.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 16.7 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
How we compare income gaps
“Typical” means the median gap across 6 schools for reading and 6 for math. The comparison uses 2026 California 1–12 schools with at least 20 tested students in each income group and a reported low-income student population. Each school counts once. Its gap is non-low-income proficiency minus low-income proficiency, including negative gaps. California state test data
CAASPP