Scores updated for 2026!

Wilsona Elementary

Los Angeles County school performance

Summary

Wilsona Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 7th percentile among California school districts.

Only 18.3% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.

Math is weaker: 12.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency18.3%
Current Math Proficiency12.7%
District Reading Rank928 / 977 (5th percentile)
District Math Rank892 / 977 (9th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$21,764
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment1,271
Low-Income Students1,139 (89.6%)
English Learners393 (30.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 1.9 points from last year and rose 0.3 points over the full period. Math rose 0.9 points from last year and rose 1.8 points over the full period.

Reading +0.3 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +1.8 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Daniela Sanchez

President

20222026This year!

Anne Misicka

Vice President

N/A2026This year!

Laura Samano

Board Clerk

N/A2028

Robert Miller

Member

N/A2026This year!

Vladimir Gomez

Member

N/A2028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 2.6 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.3 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -5.7 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

7.2% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 20.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -0.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +1.0 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 3.8 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +1.8 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -6.1 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

9.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 14.0% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +2.0 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Wilsona Elementary rank in California?

Wilsona Elementary ranks No. 928 of 977 in reading and No. 892 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Wilsona Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 18.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 12.3%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Wilsona Elementary?

Elementary districts in Los Angeles County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Wilsona ElementaryThis district12.7%18.3%
Gorman Joint41.9%56.5%
Los Nietos36.8%45.2%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.