Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardWilliam S. Hart Union High
Los Angeles County school performance
William S. Hart Union High is a good district.
Reading and math results average to the 86th percentile among California school districts.
70.2% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.
51.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 70.2% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 51.6% |
| District Reading Rank | 96 / 977 (90th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 181 / 977 (82nd percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $16,945 |
| Schools in District | 19 |
| Student Enrollment | 21,732 |
| Low-Income Students | 6,435 (31.4%) |
| English Learners | 1,040 (5.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.4 points from last year and rose 2.9 points over the full period. Math rose 3.0 points from last year and rose 7.7 points over the full period.
•Math +7.7 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Joe Messina Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Bob Jensen, CPA Board Clerk [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Erin Wilson Board Clerk [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Cherise Moore, PhD Trustee [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Dr. Aakash Ahuja Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 22.9 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 72.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 26.6 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 53.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-12.2%Understanding this district
How does William S. Hart Union High rank in California?
William S. Hart Union High ranks No. 96 of 977 in reading and No. 181 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between William S. Hart Union High’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving 9–12, proficiency ranges from 61.7% to 94.8% in reading and 27.0% to 82.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across William S. Hart Union High’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 14 of 19 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 16 of 19.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in William S. Hart Union High compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 55.9%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 35.0%, compared with 19.5%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with William S. Hart Union High?
High districts in Los Angeles County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| William S. Hart Union HighThis district | 51.6% | 70.2% |
| Antelope Valley Union High | 16.1% | 41.4% |
| Whittier Union High | 41.5% | 66.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
