Scores updated for 2026!

Waukena Joint Union Elementary

Tulare County school performance

Summary

Waukena Joint Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 28th percentile among California school districts.

Only 27.2% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

27.9% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency27.2%
Current Math Proficiency27.9%
District Reading Rank844 / 977 (14th percentile)
District Math Rank570 / 977 (42nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio22:1
Spend per Student$20,132
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment220
Low-Income Students185 (84.1%)
English Learners88 (40.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 9.3 points from last year and fell 0.7 points over the full period. Math fell 0.5 points from last year and fell 3.8 points over the full period.

Reading -0.7 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -3.8 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Joseph Machado

President

20242028

Cirila Mora

Clerk

N/A2026This year!

Leandro Sanchez

Member

N/A2026This year!

Mike A. Lewis

Member

20242028

Phyllis Harmon

Member

N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -7.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

4.1% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 26.1% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -4.8 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -5.9 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 11.2 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -4.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -21.7 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

10.2% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +0.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -19.6 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Waukena Joint Union Elementary rank in California?

Waukena Joint Union Elementary ranks No. 844 of 977 in reading and No. 570 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Waukena Joint Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 19.2%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 24.2%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Waukena Joint Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tulare County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Waukena Joint Union ElementaryThis district27.9%27.2%
Traver Joint Elementary32.9%38.6%
Hope Elementary55.2%50.3%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.