Scores updated for 2026!

Twin Hills Union Elementary

Sonoma County school performance

Summary

Reading and math results average to the 82nd percentile among California school districts.

61.9% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.Trending up

51.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency61.9%
Current Math Proficiency51.4%
District Reading Rank172 / 977 (83rd percentile)
District Math Rank185 / 977 (81st percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio18:1
Spend per Student$21,574
Schools in District4
Student Enrollment992
Low-Income Students82 (26.7%)
English Learners10 (3.3%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 1.2 points from last year and rose 0.9 points over the full period. Math rose 2.7 points from last year and rose 4.9 points over the full period.

Reading +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +4.9 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Dr. Jeff Harding

President

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

John Moise

Clerk

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Michael Ost

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Rebecca Houghton

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Terry Beck

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 17.0 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +0.8 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +0.2 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 16.8 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +5.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +4.3 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Twin Hills Union Elementary rank in California?

Twin Hills Union Elementary ranks No. 172 of 977 in reading and No. 185 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Twin Hills Union Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 4 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 4.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Twin Hills Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 50.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 39.6%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Twin Hills Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Sonoma County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Twin Hills Union ElementaryThis district51.4%61.9%
Bennett Valley Union Elementary52.5%61.2%
Wright Elementary34.6%44.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.