Scores updated for 2026!

Stone Corral Elementary

Tulare County school performance

Summary

Stone Corral Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 7th percentile among California school districts.

Only 24.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 6.9% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency24.1%
Current Math Proficiency6.9%
District Reading Rank886 / 977 (9th percentile)
District Math Rank937 / 977 (4th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio23:1
Spend per Student$26,537
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment961
Low-Income Students109 (100.0%)
English Learners72 (66.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 2.3 points from last year and rose 9.5 points over the full period. Math fell 1.4 points from last year and fell 1.1 points over the full period.

Reading +9.5 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -1.1 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Deborah Roberts

President

N/AN/A

Erik Gonzalez

Clerk

N/AN/A

Tom Redemer

Board Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

11.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 31.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -0.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +11.3 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -3.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

2.9% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 6.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -6.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -0.4 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Stone Corral Elementary rank in California?

Stone Corral Elementary ranks No. 886 of 977 in reading and No. 937 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Stone Corral Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Stone Corral Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 24.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 6.9%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Stone Corral Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tulare County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Stone Corral ElementaryThis district6.9%24.1%
Liberty Elementary36.1%52.2%
Sundale Union Elementary52.3%59.9%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.