Scores updated for 2026!

Sierra Unified

Fresno County school performance

Summary

Sierra Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 59th percentile among California school districts.

Only 49.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is quickly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 35.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency49.7%
Current Math Proficiency35.4%
District Reading Rank382 / 977 (61st percentile)
District Math Rank420 / 977 (57th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio18:1
Spend per Student$20,781
Schools in District4
Student Enrollment1,251
Low-Income Students564 (45.1%)
English Learners14 (1.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 6.5 points from last year and rose 11.0 points over the full period. Math rose 7.4 points from last year and rose 5.5 points over the full period.

Reading +11.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +5.5 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Ben Kimbler

President

[email protected]
20242028

Cortney R. Burke

Vice President

[email protected]
20242028

James F. Hoak

Clerk

[email protected]
20242028

Connie Schlaefer

Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Ginger Cardoza

Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Joe D. Denham

Member

[email protected]
20242028

Wes Qualls

Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 26.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +5.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +14.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +10.9 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.2 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.8 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +8.4 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +6.2 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Sierra Unified rank in California?

Sierra Unified ranks No. 382 of 977 in reading and No. 420 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Sierra Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 4 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 4.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Sierra Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 35.0%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 22.1%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Sierra Unified?

Unified districts in Fresno County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Sierra UnifiedThis district35.4%49.7%
Golden Plains Unified22.9%25.5%
Riverdale Joint Unified24.9%39.5%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.