Scores updated for 2026!

Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified

Sierra County school performance

Summary

Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 41st percentile among California school districts.

Only 38.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 30.3% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency38.0%
Current Math Proficiency30.3%
District Reading Rank639 / 977 (35th percentile)
District Math Rank509 / 977 (48th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio15:1
Spend per Student$22,492
Schools in District4
Student Enrollment414
Low-Income Students144 (34.8%)
English Learners21 (5.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 6.0 points from last year and rose 5.0 points over the full period. Math rose 0.1 points from last year and fell 0.8 points over the full period.

Reading +5.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -0.8 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Rhynie Hollitz

President - 2026

20242026This year!

Kelly Champion

Vice President - 2026

20222026This year!

John Martinetti

Clerk - 2026

20242028

Patty Hall

Board Member

20242028

Richard Jaquez

Board Member

20242026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 26.4 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +8.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +3.7 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 13.4 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +5.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -8.0 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -2.0 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified rank in California?

Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified ranks No. 639 of 977 in reading and No. 509 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How much do results vary between Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified’s schools?

Among the 2 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 30.8% to 41.5% in reading and 7.7% to 45.1% in math.

See the district’s schools

Are results improving across Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 3.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 22.4%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 22.4%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.