Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardRoss Valley Elementary
Marin County school performance
Ross Valley Elementary is an excellent district.
Reading and math results average to the 96th percentile among California school districts.
81.0% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.
72.3% of students met California's math standard, which is strong statewide and is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 81.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 72.3% |
| District Reading Rank | 32 / 977 (97th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 53 / 977 (95th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 17:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,977 |
| Schools in District | 5 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,679 |
| Low-Income Students | 182 (10.7%) |
| English Learners | 82 (4.8%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 3.0 points from last year and rose 4.1 points over the full period. Math rose 3.1 points from last year and rose 5.3 points over the full period.
•Math +5.3 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Rachel Litwack Board President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Chris Landles-Cobb Board Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Anna Marsh Trustee [email protected] | 2025 | 2028 |
Daniel Cassidy Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Shelley Hamilton Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 31.3 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
14.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 84.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 36.7 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
23.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 75.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Ross Valley Elementary rank in California?
Ross Valley Elementary ranks No. 32 of 977 in reading and No. 53 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Ross Valley Elementary’s schools?
Among the 4 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 78.8% to 83.5% in reading and 74.6% to 82.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Ross Valley Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 5 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 5.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Ross Valley Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 53.3%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 39.8%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Ross Valley Elementary?
Elementary districts in Marin County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Ross Valley ElementaryThis district | 72.3% | 81.0% |
| Miller Creek Elementary | 59.5% | 65.2% |
| Mill Valley Elementary | 78.0% | 81.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
