Scores updated for 2026!

Richfield Elementary

Tehama County school performance

Summary

Richfield Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 50th percentile among California school districts.

Only 47.8% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 28.6% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency47.8%
Current Math Proficiency28.6%
District Reading Rank423 / 977 (57th percentile)
District Math Rank547 / 977 (44th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$14,216
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment253
Low-Income Students132 (52.2%)
English Learners60 (23.7%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 1.0 points from last year and rose 2.0 points over the full period. Math fell 7.3 points from last year and fell 4.9 points over the full period.

Reading +2.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Jim Long

President

N/A2028

Robert Johnson

Clerk

N/A2026This year!

Alisha Savage

Board Member

N/A2028

Bryce Biswell

Board Member

N/A2028

Ethan Renaud

Board Member

N/A2028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 23.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +13.4 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

10.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 54.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -5.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +3.6 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 20.3 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.8 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +4.7 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

15.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 31.5% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +11.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -7.1 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Richfield Elementary rank in California?

Richfield Elementary ranks No. 423 of 977 in reading and No. 547 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Richfield Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 38.3%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 20.6%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Richfield Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tehama County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Richfield ElementaryThis district28.6%47.8%
Reeds Creek Elementary22.8%34.6%
Lassen View Union Elementary52.4%63.8%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.