Scores updated for 2026!

Palo Verde Union Elementary

Tulare County school performance

Summary

Palo Verde Union Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 52nd percentile among California school districts.

Only 40.5% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 38.0% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency40.5%
Current Math Proficiency38.0%
District Reading Rank581 / 977 (41st percentile)
District Math Rank361 / 977 (63rd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio22:1
Spend per Student$18,315
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment511
Low-Income Students446 (87.8%)
English Learners205 (40.4%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 0.8 points from last year and fell 8.3 points over the full period. Math rose 4.0 points from last year and fell 2.1 points over the full period.

Reading -8.3 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -2.1 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Tony Rodriguez

President

N/AN/A

Mike Waters

Vice President

N/AN/A

Chris Reed

Trustee, Area 6

N/AN/A

Judy Coble

Trustee, Area 4

N/AN/A

Ruben Macareno

Trustee, Area 2

N/AN/A

Tom Link

Trustee, Area 3

N/AN/A

Vice President

Trustee, Area 5

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -8.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -5.1 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

14.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 47.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -8.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -5.0 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 7.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -3.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

13.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 45.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -5.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Palo Verde Union Elementary rank in California?

Palo Verde Union Elementary ranks No. 581 of 977 in reading and No. 361 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Palo Verde Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 39.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 37.2%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Palo Verde Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tulare County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Palo Verde Union ElementaryThis district38.0%40.5%
Tipton Elementary26.7%38.0%
Richgrove Elementary17.4%25.0%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.