Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardOakley Union Elementary
Contra Costa County school performance
Oakley Union Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 30th percentile among California school districts.
Only 35.8% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending down.
Math is weaker: 23.3% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 35.8% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 23.3% |
| District Reading Rank | 689 / 977 (30th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 677 / 977 (31st percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $16,143 |
| Schools in District | 9 |
| Student Enrollment | 5,119 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,243 (43.7%) |
| English Learners | 682 (13.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.2 points from last year and fell 3.1 points over the full period. Math fell 1.0 points from last year and fell 1.4 points over the full period.
•Math -1.4 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Lynell Fuller Board President [email protected] | 2028 | 2028 |
Sherry Seat Board Clerk [email protected] | 2028 | 2028 |
Ann Corridon Trustee [email protected] | 2026 | 2026This year! |
Craig Pearson Trustee [email protected] | 2026 | 2026This year! |
Paul DiDonato Trustee [email protected] | 2026 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 14.3 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.7% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 36.8% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 12.6 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
+2.2%Understanding this district
How does Oakley Union Elementary rank in California?
Oakley Union Elementary ranks No. 689 of 977 in reading and No. 677 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Oakley Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 21.9% to 42.0% in reading and 23.3% to 38.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Oakley Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 9 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 9.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Oakley Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 28.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 16.6%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Oakley Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Contra Costa County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Oakley Union ElementaryThis district | 23.3% | 35.8% |
| Walnut Creek Elementary | 71.0% | 73.0% |
| Lafayette Elementary | 79.2% | 80.2% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
