Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardMoraga Elementary
Contra Costa County school performance
Moraga Elementary is an excellent district.
Reading and math results average to the 96th percentile among California school districts.
81.5% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.
73.8% of students met California's math standard, which is strong statewide but is trending down slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 81.5% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 73.8% |
| District Reading Rank | 28 / 977 (97th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 44 / 977 (96th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $16,929 |
| Schools in District | 4 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,805 |
| Low-Income Students | 101 (5.6%) |
| English Learners | 70 (3.9%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.2 points from last year and rose 0.8 points over the full period. Math fell 0.9 points from last year and fell 2.6 points over the full period.
•Math -2.6 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Larry Jacobs Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Martha A. White Board Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Kristin Kraetsch Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Lee Hays Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Stephanie Stoan Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 13.0 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
23.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 82.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 21.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
27.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 73.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Moraga Elementary rank in California?
Moraga Elementary ranks No. 28 of 977 in reading and No. 44 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Moraga Elementary’s schools?
Among the 3 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 70.8% to 87.3% in reading and 70.5% to 83.3% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Moraga Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 4 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 4.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Moraga Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 69.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 53.9%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Moraga Elementary?
Elementary districts in Contra Costa County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Moraga ElementaryThis district | 73.8% | 81.5% |
| Byron Union Elementary | 40.3% | 47.9% |
| Orinda Union | 83.3% | 87.3% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
