Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardMenifee Union
Riverside County school performance
Menifee Union is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 60th percentile among California school districts.
Only 47.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 38.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 47.9% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 38.4% |
| District Reading Rank | 420 / 977 (57th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 358 / 977 (63rd percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $15,861 |
| Schools in District | 18 |
| Student Enrollment | 13,983 |
| Low-Income Students | 7,840 (64.0%) |
| English Learners | 945 (7.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.1 points from last year and rose 1.9 points over the full period. Math fell 0.2 points from last year and rose 2.1 points over the full period.
•Math +2.1 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
J. Kyle Root President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Xavier Padilla Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | N/A |
Jackie Johansen Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | N/A |
Morgan Singleton II Governing Board Member [email protected] | Appointed | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 15.0 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.2% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 48.8% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 15.3 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.2% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 39.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-1.3%Understanding this district
How does Menifee Union rank in California?
Menifee Union ranks No. 420 of 977 in reading and No. 358 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Menifee Union’s schools?
Among the 11 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 36.2% to 58.3% in reading and 33.6% to 55.6% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Menifee Union’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 12 of 16 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 9 of 16. 1 school has a different reporting period and is excluded.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Menifee Union compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 42.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 33.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Menifee Union?
Elementary districts in Riverside County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Menifee UnionThis district | 38.4% | 47.9% |
| Perris Elementary | 19.6% | 31.9% |
| Romoland Elementary | 25.1% | 38.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
