Scores updated for 2026!

Mammoth Unified

Mono County school performance

Summary

Mammoth Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 55th percentile among California school districts.

Only 42.4% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 39.8% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency42.4%
Current Math Proficiency39.8%
District Reading Rank544 / 977 (44th percentile)
District Math Rank336 / 977 (66th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio16:1
Spend per Student$18,681
Schools in District3
Student Enrollment1,087
Low-Income Students513 (47.3%)
English Learners281 (25.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 0.9 points from last year and rose 0.8 points over the full period. Math rose 5.4 points from last year and rose 4.6 points over the full period.

Reading +0.8 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +4.6 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Chelsea Nash

President

20222026This year!

Alonso Escobar

Clerk

20202028

Marcy Castro

Member

20242028

Marty Thompson

Member

20222026This year!

Sarah Keith

Member

20252026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 37.7 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +0.7 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

4.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 61.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +1.1 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -2.4 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 37.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +3.1 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +5.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

7.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 60.5% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +3.0 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Mammoth Unified rank in California?

Mammoth Unified ranks No. 544 of 977 in reading and No. 336 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Mammoth Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 3.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Mammoth Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 25.9%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 23.3%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Mammoth Unified?

Unified districts in Mono County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Mammoth UnifiedThis district39.8%42.4%
Eastern Sierra Unified28.4%45.5%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.