Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardLittle Lake City Elementary
Los Angeles County school performance
Reading and math results average to the 75th percentile among California school districts.
60.0% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 42.2% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 60.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 42.2% |
| District Reading Rank | 196 / 977 (80th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 291 / 977 (70th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $21,329 |
| Schools in District | 9 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,535 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,762 (79.2%) |
| English Learners | 320 (9.2%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.2 points from last year and rose 2.2 points over the full period. Math fell 2.0 points from last year and rose 0.5 points over the full period.
•Math +0.5 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Jasmine Sanchez President [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Hilda Zamora Vice President [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Gina Ramirez Clerk [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Lisa Chavarria Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Manuel Cantu Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.8 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
17.2% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 60.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 17.6 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
12.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 42.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results held steady.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Little Lake City Elementary rank in California?
Little Lake City Elementary ranks No. 196 of 977 in reading and No. 291 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Little Lake City Elementary’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 47.2% to 63.9% in reading and 38.1% to 60.2% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Little Lake City Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 7 of 9 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 9.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Little Lake City Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 56.2%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 38.8%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Little Lake City Elementary?
Elementary districts in Los Angeles County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Little Lake City ElementaryThis district | 42.2% | 60.0% |
| Keppel Union Elementary | 14.9% | 23.7% |
| Eastside Union Elementary | 17.0% | 23.4% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
