Scores updated for 2026!

Lakeside Union Elementary

Kings County school performance

Summary

Lakeside Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 8th percentile among California school districts.

Only 21.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Math is weaker: 12.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency21.7%
Current Math Proficiency12.7%
District Reading Rank907 / 977 (7th percentile)
District Math Rank889 / 977 (9th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio16:1
Spend per Student$21,612
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment238
Low-Income Students230 (96.6%)
English Learners88 (37.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 4.3 points from last year and fell 2.9 points over the full period. Math fell 6.4 points from last year and fell 10.0 points over the full period.

Reading -2.9 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -10.0 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Derrek Meek

Board President

N/AN/A

Mari Shackelford

Clerk

N/AN/A

Blake Garcia

Trustee

N/AN/A

Brandon LaMattino

Trustee

N/AN/A

Gay Hooper

Trustee

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

1.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 24.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -6.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -1.6 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -9.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

5.4% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 9.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -1.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -15.0 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Lakeside Union Elementary rank in California?

Lakeside Union Elementary ranks No. 907 of 977 in reading and No. 889 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Lakeside Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 21.9%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 13.3%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Lakeside Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Kings County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Lakeside Union ElementaryThis district12.7%21.7%
Island Union Elementary53.6%57.2%
Kings River-Hardwick Union Elementary64.1%70.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.