Scores updated for 2026!

Lakeside Union

Kern County school performance

Summary

Lakeside Union is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 24th percentile among California school districts.

Only 37.3% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 17.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency37.3%
Current Math Proficiency17.6%
District Reading Rank659 / 977 (33rd percentile)
District Math Rank824 / 977 (16th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio23:1
Spend per Student$13,140
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment1,695
Low-Income Students1,132 (66.8%)
English Learners284 (16.8%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 1.4 points from last year and rose 2.1 points over the full period. Math fell 0.4 points from last year and rose 1.1 points over the full period.

Reading +2.1 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +1.1 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Mario Buoni

President

N/AN/A

Tamara Jones

Vice President

N/AN/A

Alan Banducci

Clerk

N/AN/A

Darin Buoni

Member

N/AN/A

Russell Robertson

Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 13.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -0.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +6.1 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

7.7% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 39.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +4.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +3.2 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.7 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +1.5 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

10.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 15.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -1.3 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Lakeside Union rank in California?

Lakeside Union ranks No. 659 of 977 in reading and No. 824 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Lakeside Union’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Lakeside Union compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 32.5%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 14.4%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Lakeside Union?

Elementary districts in Kern County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Lakeside UnionThis district17.6%37.3%
Beardsley Elementary12.3%23.8%
Taft City23.1%34.3%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.