Scores updated for 2026!

Kings River Union Elementary

Tulare County school performance

Summary

Kings River Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 23rd percentile among California school districts.

Only 30.6% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 22.5% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency30.6%
Current Math Proficiency22.5%
District Reading Rank799 / 977 (18th percentile)
District Math Rank709 / 977 (28th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$20,919
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment389
Low-Income Students341 (87.7%)
English Learners147 (37.8%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 2.4 points from last year and rose 2.3 points over the full period. Math fell 0.8 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period.

Reading +2.3 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +3.3 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Dr. Dan Waldner

President

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Ms. Liz Avila

Clerk

[email protected]
N/A2024

Mr. Daniel Aguilar

Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Mr. Jeff Jost

Member

[email protected]
N/A2024

Ms. Mayra Alcala

Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 16.3 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -4.5 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

9.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 34.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +1.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +1.9 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 30.1 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +3.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income 0.0 percentage points

English Learners vs English Native

5.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 28.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -0.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +8.2 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Kings River Union Elementary rank in California?

Kings River Union Elementary ranks No. 799 of 977 in reading and No. 709 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Kings River Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 29.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 19.9%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Kings River Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tulare County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Kings River Union ElementaryThis district22.5%30.6%
Sequoia Union Elementary37.3%47.8%
Woodville Union Elementary35.5%43.6%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.