Scores updated for 2026!

Guerneville Elementary

Sonoma County school performance

Summary

Guerneville Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 27th percentile among California school districts.

Only 36.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 20.2% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency36.9%
Current Math Proficiency20.2%
District Reading Rank666 / 977 (32nd percentile)
District Math Rank765 / 977 (22nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio8:1
Spend per Student$33,641
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment396
Low-Income Students10 (71.4%)
English Learners0 (0.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 0.9 points from last year and rose 0.7 points over the full period. Math rose 1.3 points from last year and fell 3.1 points over the full period.

Reading +0.7 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -3.1 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Gay Guidotti

Board President

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Sarah Imperato

Board Clerk

[email protected]
N/AN/A

John Kornfeld

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Laura Parent

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Rachael Handley

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students are 1.2 points ahead in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +5.0 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -10.9 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -0.6 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 10.3 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -3.3 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +7.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -4.7 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Guerneville Elementary rank in California?

Guerneville Elementary ranks No. 666 of 977 in reading and No. 765 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Guerneville Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Guerneville Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 37.2%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 17.7%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Guerneville Elementary?

Elementary districts in Sonoma County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Guerneville ElementaryThis district20.2%36.9%
Harmony Union Elementary34.2%63.3%
Wilmar Union Elementary45.9%51.5%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.