Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardFillmore Unified
Ventura County school performance
Fillmore Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 20th percentile among California school districts.
Only 31.3% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 19.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 31.3% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 19.4% |
| District Reading Rank | 784 / 977 (20th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 786 / 977 (20th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 20:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,970 |
| Schools in District | 8 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,685 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,701 (73.9%) |
| English Learners | 759 (20.8%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 3.1 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period. Math rose 1.2 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period.
•Math +3.3 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Olivia Palacio Board President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Tricia Gradias Board President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Scott Beylik Board Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Sean Morris Board Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Lucy Rangel Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 16.7 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.2% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 34.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 12.0 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
9.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 22.1% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-2.3%Understanding this district
How does Fillmore Unified rank in California?
Fillmore Unified ranks No. 784 of 977 in reading and No. 786 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Fillmore Unified’s schools?
Among the 4 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 26.1% to 45.1% in reading and 24.3% to 34.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Fillmore Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 5 of 7 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 6 of 7.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Fillmore Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 27.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 16.8%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Fillmore Unified?
Unified districts in Ventura County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Fillmore UnifiedThis district | 19.4% | 31.3% |
| Oak Park Unified | 72.2% | 79.0% |
| Santa Paula Unified | 24.5% | 35.6% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
