Scores updated for 2026!

Durham Unified

Butte County school performance

Summary

Durham Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 74th percentile among California school districts.

58.1% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 43.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency58.1%
Current Math Proficiency43.4%
District Reading Rank227 / 977 (77th percentile)
District Math Rank273 / 977 (72nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio18:1
Spend per Student$13,954
Schools in District3
Student Enrollment1,048
Low-Income Students409 (39.0%)
English Learners63 (6.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 8.0 points from last year and rose 10.0 points over the full period. Math rose 6.6 points from last year and rose 1.5 points over the full period.

Reading +10.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +1.5 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Buzz Landon

President

20222026This year!

Ed McLaughlin

Clerk

20242028

Andrew Sohnrey

Trustee

20242028

Garrett Meyer

Trustee

20242028

Jennie DuBose

Trustee

20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 16.1 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +13.0 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +6.7 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

10.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 60.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +7.0 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +9.0 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 17.7 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -0.5 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 47.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -5.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +1.3 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Durham Unified rank in California?

Durham Unified ranks No. 227 of 977 in reading and No. 273 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Durham Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 3.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Durham Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 48.0%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 32.1%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Durham Unified?

Unified districts in Butte County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Durham UnifiedThis district43.4%58.1%
Gridley Unified28.5%47.8%
Biggs Unified27.6%35.2%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.