Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardCentralia Elementary
Orange County school performance
Centralia Elementary is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 81st percentile among California school districts.
57.3% of students met California's reading standard, and it is holding steady.
57.8% of students met California's math standard and is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 57.3% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 57.8% |
| District Reading Rank | 238 / 977 (76th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 131 / 977 (87th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,222 |
| Schools in District | 8 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,990 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,656 (66.5%) |
| English Learners | 943 (23.6%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.6 points from last year and fell 0.2 points over the full period. Math rose 2.1 points from last year and rose 0.6 points over the full period.
•Math +0.6 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Luis Flores President (Area 5 Trustee) [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Angela M. Hernandez Vice President (Area 3 Trustee) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Ahsanul Hoque Clerk (Area 4 Trustee) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Art Montez Area 2 Trustee [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Henry Charoen Area 1 Trustee [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 25.3 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
17.6% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 61.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 24.1 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
23.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 60.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Centralia Elementary rank in California?
Centralia Elementary ranks No. 238 of 977 in reading and No. 131 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Centralia Elementary’s schools?
Among the 8 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 28.9% to 88.7% in reading and 30.6% to 87.2% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Centralia Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 8 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 8.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Centralia Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 50.3%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 51.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Centralia Elementary?
Elementary districts in Orange County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Centralia ElementaryThis district | 57.8% | 57.3% |
| La Habra City Elementary | 35.8% | 43.2% |
| Buena Park Elementary | 37.2% | 44.6% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
