Centinela Valley Union High
Los Angeles County school performance
Centinela Valley Union High is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 38th percentile among California school districts.
Only 49.8% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.
Math is weaker: 16.5% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 49.8% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 16.5% |
| District Reading Rank | 377 / 977 (62nd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 840 / 977 (14th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,917 |
| Schools in District | 7 |
| Student Enrollment | 6,305 |
| Low-Income Students | 4,329 (80.6%) |
| English Learners | 892 (16.6%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 1.6 points from last year and fell 0.1 points over the full period. Math rose 0.7 points from last year and rose 2.0 points over the full period.
•Math +2.0 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Hugo M. Rojas II Board President (Trustee Area 2) | 2022 (ran unopposed) | 2026This year! |
Estefany A. Castañeda Board Vice President (Trustee Area 5) | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Marisela Ruiz Board Clerk (Trustee Area 1) | 2022 (ran unopposed) | 2026This year! |
Gloria A. Ramos Board Member (Trustee Area 4) | N/A | 2028 |
Nohemi Ramirez Board Member (Trustee Area 3) | N/A | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 2.1 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
7.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 53.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 6.0 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
1.6% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 16.5% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Centinela Valley Union High rank in California?
Centinela Valley Union High ranks No. 377 of 977 in reading and No. 840 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Centinela Valley Union High’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving 9–12, proficiency ranges from 0.0% to 60.9% in reading and 0.0% to 46.7% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Centinela Valley Union High’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 5 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 5. 1 school has a different reporting period and is excluded.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Centinela Valley Union High compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 49.5%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 15.5%, compared with 19.5%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Centinela Valley Union High?
High districts in Los Angeles County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Centinela Valley Union HighThis district | 16.5% | 49.8% |
| El Monte Union High | 31.2% | 61.7% |
| Whittier Union High | 41.5% | 66.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
