Scores updated for 2026!

Capay Joint Union Elementary

Glenn County school performance

Summary

Capay Joint Union Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 58th percentile among California school districts.

Only 48.3% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 35.6% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency48.3%
Current Math Proficiency35.6%
District Reading Rank411 / 977 (58th percentile)
District Math Rank415 / 977 (58th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio21:1
Spend per Student$15,117
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment211
Low-Income Students87 (41.4%)
English Learners27 (12.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 16.4 points from last year and fell 6.6 points over the full period. Math rose 2.6 points from last year and fell 4.9 points over the full period.

Reading -6.6 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Lori Strieby

President

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Cindy Ward

Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Daniel Turnbull

Member

[email protected]
20242028

Maddie Coleman

Member

[email protected]
20242028

Megan Jorgensen

Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 39.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -15.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +2.2 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

8.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 56.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -13.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -2.1 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.7 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -5.8 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

8.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 41.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -13.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -1.6 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Capay Joint Union Elementary rank in California?

Capay Joint Union Elementary ranks No. 411 of 977 in reading and No. 415 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Capay Joint Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 28.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 22.8%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Capay Joint Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Glenn County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Capay Joint Union ElementaryThis district35.6%48.3%
Plaza Elementary69.6%67.4%
Lake Elementary51.2%71.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.