Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardBerryessa Union Elementary
Santa Clara County school performance
Reading and math results average to the 84th percentile among California school districts.
63.2% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending down slightly.
54.7% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 63.2% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 54.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 161 / 977 (84th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 151 / 977 (85th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,830 |
| Schools in District | 10 |
| Student Enrollment | 5,907 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,777 (30.1%) |
| English Learners | 1,280 (21.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 1.5 points from last year and fell 0.5 points over the full period. Math fell 0.4 points from last year and fell 0.2 points over the full period.
•Math -0.2 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Jaria Jaug President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Khoa Nguyen Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Jai Srinivasan Clerk [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Shanna Brewer Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Thelma Boac Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 29.7 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
22.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 60.8% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 32.8 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
22.9% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 49.1% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Berryessa Union Elementary rank in California?
Berryessa Union Elementary ranks No. 161 of 977 in reading and No. 151 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Berryessa Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 45.6% to 73.4% in reading and 34.3% to 73.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Berryessa Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 5 of 10 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 10.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Berryessa Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 43.7%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 33.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Berryessa Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Santa Clara County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Berryessa Union ElementaryThis district | 54.7% | 63.2% |
| Sunnyvale | 53.8% | 55.6% |
| Campbell Union | 46.4% | 52.1% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
