Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardBeaumont Unified
Riverside County school performance
Beaumont Unified is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 65th percentile among California school districts.
52.6% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.
Math is weaker: 38.2% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 52.6% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 38.2% |
| District Reading Rank | 324 / 977 (67th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 359 / 977 (63rd percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 24:1 |
| Spend per Student | $18,496 |
| Schools in District | 16 |
| Student Enrollment | 19,485 |
| Low-Income Students | 8,560 (68.8%) |
| English Learners | 877 (7.0%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 2.0 points from last year and rose 9.9 points over the full period. Math rose 1.7 points from last year and rose 6.5 points over the full period.
•Math +6.5 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Jeff Brown Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Dr. Lanston M. Sylvester Board Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
David Sanchez Board Clerk [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Melissa Williamson Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Susie Lara Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.0 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 53.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 15.5 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 39.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-0.4%Understanding this district
How does Beaumont Unified rank in California?
Beaumont Unified ranks No. 324 of 977 in reading and No. 359 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Beaumont Unified’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 46.3% to 56.9% in reading and 39.9% to 54.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Beaumont Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 12 of 16 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 13 of 16.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Beaumont Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 47.0%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 33.8%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Beaumont Unified?
Unified districts in Riverside County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Beaumont UnifiedThis district | 38.2% | 52.6% |
| Val Verde Unified | 22.8% | 41.9% |
| Palm Springs Unified | 22.5% | 36.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
