Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardAlta Loma Elementary
San Bernardino County school performance
Reading and math results average to the 85th percentile among California school districts.
67.5% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.
53.5% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 67.5% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 53.5% |
| District Reading Rank | 124 / 977 (87th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 162 / 977 (84th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $15,454 |
| Schools in District | 10 |
| Student Enrollment | 5,535 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,208 (39.8%) |
| English Learners | 295 (5.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 1.9 points from last year and rose 1.6 points over the full period. Math rose 1.1 points from last year and rose 0.4 points over the full period.
•Math +0.4 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Eric Chung President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Dr. Malinda L. Hurley Vice-President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Rebecca Davies Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Brad Buller Member [email protected] | N/A | 2028 |
Jessica D. Martinez Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 18.0 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
16.7% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 68.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.3 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
27.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 52.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Alta Loma Elementary rank in California?
Alta Loma Elementary ranks No. 124 of 977 in reading and No. 162 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Alta Loma Elementary’s schools?
Among the 6 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 61.7% to 74.6% in reading and 54.4% to 70.3% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Alta Loma Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 6 of 10 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 8 of 10.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Alta Loma Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 58.2%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 43.0%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Alta Loma Elementary?
Elementary districts in San Bernardino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Alta Loma ElementaryThis district | 53.5% | 67.5% |
| Oro Grande | 18.5% | 35.9% |
| Central Elementary | 31.9% | 48.5% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
