Is this your school? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardJohn Morse Therapeutic Center
1901 60th Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95822-4314
Summary
John Morse Therapeutic Center is badly underperforming.
Only 9.5% of students met California's reading standard, and it is quickly trending down.
10.0% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 9.5% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 10.0% |
| Reading State Rank | N/A |
| Math State Rank | N/A |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 3:1 |
| Student enrollment (2024–25) | 15 |
| Low-Income Students | 11 (73.3%) |
| English Learners | 2 (13.3%) |
School Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPP| Admissions | Open enrollment |
|---|---|
| Charter school | No |
| Magnet school | No |
Test score trends
Reading fell 10.5 points from last year. Math fell 1.1 points from last year.
•Math -1.1 percentage points (2025–2026)Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Only one group has a reportable reading result.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
No reported results for 2024.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
No reported results for 2024.
Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Only one group has a reportable math result.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
No reported results for 2024.
•English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
No reported results for 2024.
How we compare income gaps
“Typical” means the median gap across 4 schools for reading and 4 for math. The comparison uses 2026 California 3–8 schools with at least 20 tested students in each income group and a reported low-income student population. Each school counts once. Its gap is non-low-income proficiency minus low-income proficiency, including negative gaps. California state test data
