Exeter Independent Study (Alternative)
1107 E Rocky Hill Drive, Exeter, CA 93221-1326
Summary
Exeter Independent Study (Alternative) is badly underperforming.
Only 33.3% of students met California's reading standard, but it is quickly trending up.
Math is weaker: 25.0% of students met California's math standard, but it is quickly trending up.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 33.3% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 25.0% |
| Reading State Rank | N/A |
| Math State Rank | N/A |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Student enrollment (2024–25) | 47 |
| Low-Income Students | 40 (85.1%) |
| English Learners | 6 (12.8%) |
School Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPP| Admissions | Open enrollment |
|---|---|
| Charter school | No |
| Magnet school | No |
Test score trends
Reading rose 8.3 points from last year and rose 13.3 points over the full period. Math rose 15.5 points from last year and rose 15.5 points over the full period.
•Math +15.5 percentage points (2024–2026)Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Race and ethnicity breakdown unavailable.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
•English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Race and ethnicity breakdown unavailable.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
•English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
How we compare income gaps
“Typical” means the median gap across 66 schools for reading and 66 for math. The comparison uses 2026 California 7–12 schools with at least 20 tested students in each income group and a reported low-income student population. Each school counts once. Its gap is non-low-income proficiency minus low-income proficiency, including negative gaps. California state test data
