Is this your school? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardBig Valley Jr. Sr. High
400 Bridge Street, Bieber, CA 96009-0157
Summary
Big Valley Jr. Sr. High is badly underperforming.
Only 30.4% of students met California's reading standard, and it is quickly trending down.
Math is weaker: 8.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is quickly trending down.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 30.4% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 8.7% |
| Reading State Rank | N/A |
| Math State Rank | N/A |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 7:1 |
| Student enrollment (2024–25) | 43 |
| Low-Income Students | 26 (60.5%) |
| English Learners | 5 (11.6%) |
School Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPP| Admissions | Open enrollment |
|---|---|
| Charter school | No |
| Magnet school | No |
Test score trends
Reading fell 25.8 points from last year and fell 11.2 points over the full period. Math fell 14.8 points from last year and fell 14.4 points over the full period.
•Math -14.4 percentage points (2024–2026)Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Only one group has a reportable reading result.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
•English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Only one group has a reportable math result.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Grade-level score distribution unavailable.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
•English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
How we compare income gaps
“Typical” means the median gap across 66 schools for reading and 66 for math. The comparison uses 2026 California 7–12 schools with at least 20 tested students in each income group and a reported low-income student population. Each school counts once. Its gap is non-low-income proficiency minus low-income proficiency, including negative gaps. California state test data
