Scores updated for 2026!

El Dorado Union High

El Dorado County school performance

Summary

Reading and math results average to the 82nd percentile among California school districts.

67.4% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 47.9% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency67.4%
Current Math Proficiency47.9%
District Reading Rank126 / 977 (87th percentile)
District Math Rank220 / 977 (78th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio23:1
Spend per Student$16,222
Schools in District6
Student Enrollment6,410
Low-Income Students1,488 (23.5%)
English Learners161 (2.5%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 1.6 points from last year and rose 1.9 points over the full period. Math rose 1.0 points from last year and rose 2.7 points over the full period.

Reading +1.9 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +2.7 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Brooke B. Van Komen

Board President

20222026This year!

Lori M. Veerkamp

Board Clerk

20042028

David J. Del Rio

Board Member

20122028

Jessicca K. Rodgers

Board Member

20192026This year!

Timothy M. Cary

Board Member

20012026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.1 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +2.1 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

8.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 68.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -11.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +2.1 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 28.5 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +2.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

3.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 49.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +3.6 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does El Dorado Union High rank in California?

El Dorado Union High ranks No. 126 of 977 in reading and No. 220 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How much do results vary between El Dorado Union High’s schools?

Among the 5 schools serving 9–12, proficiency ranges from 53.7% to 81.3% in reading and 27.0% to 63.5% in math.

See the district’s schools

Are results improving across El Dorado Union High’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 6 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 6.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in El Dorado Union High compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 48.9%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 26.1%, compared with 19.5%.

See student-group results
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.